Posts Tagged: weight loss


15
Oct 10

What Jenny Craig Doesn’t Want You to Know

Daily Life Wellness

Maybe you’ve seen the late-night infomercials for the following: creams that “erase” wrinkles…diet pills that magically burn fat…and acne creams that will get you laid.

Aside from the bold claims, what’s the common thread among these items?

They’re all made for quick consumption — and can be used up over time. This means, if you like the product, you’ll have to buy more…and more…and more. It’s a very profitable model for product sellers.

Guthy Renker, one of the heavyweight infomercial producers, switched to this model almost exclusively some years back to take advantage of the automatic repeat business.

Diet programs, not coincidentally, also find success by selling annual memberships and meal programs that need to be purchased again and again. It’s genius, really. For a few hundred dollars annually, plus hundreds more per month in meals, you get a prepackaged roadmap to health — without the “hassle” of trying to figure it out on your own.

Take Jenny Craig, for example. It’s a very polished system that includes meals that you’re encouraged to buy, a popular community forum, and consultations with real-life Jenny Craig “partners” — and it’s all sold using high profile celebrity success stories. (Valerie Bertinelli, is a recent example — as is Jason Alexander of Seinfeld fame.)

I have no doubt that the weight loss success stories promoted by Jenny Craig, Nutrisystem and similar plans are legitimate. However, once you pull back the gilded curtain, it’s really just simple calorie restriction that produces weight loss.

I don’t have an axe to grind specifically with Jenny; “she” just happens to be a good example of where I’m headed with this…

Here are the two chief issues I have with diet plans where you’re goaded to buy meals, pills, shakes and cookies.

1. Nutrition — real nutrition — takes a back seat to portion size and calorie restriction.

2. The implication is that success can only be achieved by using their products; they never tell you that it’s something you can do entirely on your own — without the expensive products and the continuity program.

Let’s look at the first one: Nutrition. In fairness to Jenny Craig nowhere could I find an actual ingredients list for any of their “Jenny’s Cuisine” menu items (WTF?) — so it would be difficult for me to pass judgement on the whole deal, on that basis.

However, they do publish sample menus showcasing things like the following: blueberry mini loaf; frosted oats cereal; and cookies ‘n’ cream cheesecake. Now, again, no ingredients published, but I have a hard time believing any of this “diet food” is made with stuff that’s genuinely good for me.

So, then, is eating frosted oats cereal really the way to optimal health as Jenny Craig would suggest? Of course not. But, if the portions are small enough, and you can handle the starvation thing well, then you might lose weight.

Score! Mission accomplished…at least temporarily.

How long can someone really go…eating only 1,200 calories (or less!) a day — before falling off the wagon and gorging themselves silly? I ate 1200 calories before 9 AM this morning, for goodness sake! Starvation is not the answer.

Let’s head over to item 2: Success on their terms only.

I get it. The promise of health and/or weight loss in a shiny new box is very attractive. It’s positioned as a blueprint for weight loss success — provided you continue to buy the meals, vitamins, consulting, etc., of course.

I’ve touched on this before in a previous post about perfect diets. My stance is that any program that requires or “encourages” you to spend money to buy their weight loss/muscle building products should be seen as suspect.

Nobody has the one right answer to health/wellness — and they certainly don’t have it in a pill…or powder…or a fancy little blueberry mini loaf.

Unfortunately, many folks too easily buy into the promises of “effortless” weight loss and radiant health, or the promise of the one, last way that’s going to be the permanent solution for them.

I know I’ve been guilty of it in the past.

Some people so blindly believe this shit that they’ll shout it from the rooftops even though their own results have been less than stellar. I had an obese woman tell me a few months ago at a business lunch — with a straight face — that I shouldn’t be eating anything after 8:00 PM or I would suffer terrible weight gain. As if 8:00 is the fucking witching hour for food consumption or something. Some of my biggest meals are after 10 PM, and I’ve never had a problem.

The secret is that there is no secret. When you’re done with all the hype and noise you realize that all you really have to do is make better choices at the grocery store and move around a little more — then make these your new habits.

Unfortunately, I doubt there will be any high profile ad campaigns for broccoli and coconut milk anytime soon. Cookies ‘n’ cream cheesecake is just an easier sell — especially if George Costanza is doing the selling.

###

Photo

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,


7
Oct 10

Why the USDA Food Pyramid is Dangerous

Daily Life Wellness | Food Pyramid Update
The food pyramid is due for an update.

I’ll assume you’re at least loosely familiar with the USDA’s guidelines as to how America should be eating. (if not, refresh your memory and head over to the Dept. of Agriculture and take a peek.)

The current guidelines, unveiled in 2005 and dubbed “MyPyramid,” have largely been viewed as a failure. There’s little in the way of actual nutritional guidance, and it’s confusing. For example, the current pyramid recommends “at least” 3 oz. of bread and cereals each day, but, oddly, doesn’t provide quantity recommendations for anything else. “Eat more vegetables” is the hard-hitting, tell-it-like-it-is advice we’re given instead.

Every five years the USDA, CDC, and various “health experts” gather to discuss the makeup of the new pyramid and issue new guidelines. And this December those experts will be gathering once more — and America waits anxiously for the outcome.

I’m not a fan of the pyramid. There are many problems with the guidelines, but let’s focus on one in particular…

Where there is government, there are lobbysts. And it is the sole job of a lobby to gain favor for, in this case, the food producing industries represented on the pyramid. And each producer wants their say, lest their product get “demoted” or somehow disparaged on the new pyramid.

For example, the meat lobby (not to mention the yes-it-really-does-exist Salt Institute) is already opposing strict guidelines on sodium intake — which would affect the perception of lunch meat, among other foods.

The milk lobby is up in arms about warnings to cut back on sugar. Chocolate and strawberry flavored milk might just fall out of favor. (Blasphemy!)

And the egg lobby wants nothing to do with proposed verbiage advocating a “plant-based” diet for fear that it would be misunderstood as meaning vegetarian.

So…how, then, can a government appointed committee possibly be objective in the face of so much political pressure? It can’t. As proof, the current pyramid doesn’t expressly warn against eating anything at all — not even the stuff we know is bad for us.

Is it really in our best interest to have politicians and the big food conglomerates dictate how we should eat?

Imagine how many politicians would be out of a job if the pyramid guidelines came out and said: “don’t fucking eat anything with corn syrup in it; it’s terrible for you.” Corn producers would mount a campaign to send them packing. Witness the re-election loss of Senator George McGovern in 1980, who in 1977 (misguidedly) recommended that folks cut back on red meat and dairy in a report titled Dietary Goals for the United States.

Among McGovern’s constituents: pissed off cattle ranchers and dairy farmers in his home state of South Dakota.

The reality is that corn syrup is awful, dirty stuff. Everyone knows it, and now, finally, even science is catching up. (But that’s not stopping the corn syrup producers from changing their tactics.) Since the McGovern debacle, no one wants to risk his or her neck by actually promoting some specific guidelines.

The fact is, watered down nutritional guidelines from Uncle Sam are at best ineffective, and at worst, downright dangerous, if it avoids genuine real-world guidance in order to appease politicians and their food-producing constituents.

But, let’s face it, does anyone actually pay attention to the USDA’s food guidelines? Well, for most of us, the answer is no when deciding what to eat day-to-day. But, the guidelines do impact what is served in school lunches and the makeup of nutrition labels, for example. Plus they’re included in educational materials provided by hospitals, and in connection with food stamp programs, among other things.

The effect is broader than what you may realize.

Where do I stand? That’s easy, and I don’t need a pyramid: Cut out most (or all) of the grains/cereals, then eat lots of veggies, some fruit, lean meats, eggs, some nuts and seeds, some dairy, plus good fats (olive oil and coconut milk, for example.) Easy.

The Obama administration has a huge opportunity here, but my guess is that we’ll get more of the same come December.

-Mike

Photo

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,


19
Sep 10

Is There A Perfect Diet?

Daily Life Wellness | Is There a Perfect Diet?

I’m the first to admit that I don’t know the answer to that question definitively.

It seems that every day some new “diet” comes along that promises to be the last greatest diet you’ll ever need. Or that you can lose 60 pounds in a month eating nothing but…acorns and tomato juice. (Just made that up, but with the right marketing, I think I could make it a bestseller.)

Keep in mind…when I say “diet” I don’t necessarily mean weight loss — more like a long term eating plan for health and life wellness. “Long term eating plan” isn’t as sexy as “Lose Weight Today!” but it’s more practical, realistic and sustainable.

There are no shortages of ways to eat, even among the paleo method that I largely subscribe to. And there are no shortages of crazy diets either.

First, there are the outright ridiculous “diets”:

Ever heard of the Cookie Diet? No? Well it actually exists. The deal, apparently, is that you eat a bunch of cookies and supplements, knock them back with shakes and special teas — and you lose weight. Well, you might lose weight by way of calorie restriction (calories taken in vs. calories expended) but is that really a long term solution for health and life wellness? Cookies?

Then there’s the so-called Twinkie Diet. (Yes, really.) Professor Mark Haub at KSU, in an effort to “disprove common beliefs about nutrition,” subsisted on a diet of Twinkies, donuts, and similar snacks for a month. In addition to losing weight, Haub hopes to challenge the notion “that foods regarded as nutritious may, in fact, be unhealthy, while foods regarded as junk may have some benefits.”

What benefits, exactly, are derived from Twinkies, Mark? Let’s see, included among the many ingredients in your average Twinkie are…corn syrup, high fructose corn syrup, and corn syrup solids. (Apparently there wasn’t quite enough corn syrup in there already, so they needed to bulk it up with some additional “solids.”) Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you know that corn syrup is not healthy stuff.

Thanks to Doug at Health Habits for the head’s up on the Twinkie Diet.

And let’s not forget Morgan Spurlock’s (mis)adventures eating only McDonald’s for 30 days. (Not really a diet, of course, but a fascinating reminder of how a body can be ravaged by fast food.)

The shiny crazy diets with the big claims are (or should be) the easiest to stay away from.

But what about the rest of the diets out there?

Face it: Out there is an endlessly churning sea of books, blogs, supplements and workouts at the core of the multi billion dollar health and fitness industry. Tough to choose.

Your first stop should be common sense. If you’re looking for a lifelong nutrition plan then draw the line at anything promising quick weight loss. You may lose weight, but is it sustainable over the long term — and will it be something you enjoy?

I would then make sure that lots of fruits and vegetables are included. The food we grow, generally speaking, is far better for us than the stuff we process. Any diet that puts silly and arbitrary restrictions on vegetables and fruit should be suspect.

Also, does the diet you’re considering require you to buy special supplements or foods only sold by the author and/or marketer? Suspect.

Rational amounts of exercise should also be on the menu here, as well as plenty of rest. While exercise isn’t a diet plan, per se, nutrition and exercise go hand in hand.

From there it comes down to what you can sustain healthfully, while looking and feeling your best.

I mentioned the paleo diet above, which is how I eat 90 percent or more of the time. It does meet the criteria above and I am definitely a fan, but I would never suggest that paleo is the absolute best method for everyone. I do think, in general, some version of paleo is probably optimal for most — but I leave that up to you to experiment with.

A good place to start would be Robb Wolf’s new book The Paleo Solution (disclosure: affiliate link.) I’ve been a listener of Robb’s weekly podcasts for a while now, and when it comes to the science behind this paleo deal, this guy knows his stuff. Plus he blends humor with an easy to understand delivery, so it’s also enjoyable.

So, back to the beginning: Is there a perfect diet? Probably not for everyone in absolute terms. There’s only the perfect one for you: The one that you can sustain for the long term, and keeps you not only looking good, but feeling and performing at your best.

- Mike

Photo: Leonardini

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Technorati Tags: , , , ,


8
Sep 10

How I Lost 15 Pounds And Increased My Bench Press by 30 Pounds… in 3 Months — Part 1 of 2

Daily Life Wellness | Losing Weight, Getting Stronger

Physically, I’ve undergone some good changes in the last few months. Probably the most outward change — at least to the people who know me best — is that I lost 15 pounds. That’s 15 pounds of needless, pointless, ridiculous flab. Right now I’m weighing in at 170 pounds, and I’ve never felt better…and I’ve never been stronger.

Of course, when I weighed 185 I didn’t really think that I needed to lose that much — maybe a couple pounds — and I wasn’t “fat” by anyone’s definition. When I started down this road I wasn’t aiming to lose weight, necessarily.

It was really just a crazy dietary and exercise experiment…with me as the guinea pig. An overall life wellness kind of deal.

The strength and weight loss factors have really been two distinct efforts for me. Most of the weight loss is due to dietary changes. All the strength is, of course, due to changes I’ve made to my workout routines. What’s great is that the strength increases have come despite the loss in overall bodyweight.

With that said, this is going to be a two-post deal: the first (this one) will deal with the diet changes. The second will deal with the workouts.

So let’s get after it…

Around April of this year I got turned on to one particular blog that caused a seismic shift in my thinking about eating. That blog? Mark’s Daily Apple. This blog clued me into the “primal” (many times referred to as “paleo”) way of eating. In a nutshell, this consists of eating whole cuts of meat, including beef, fowl & fish, “good” fats (olive oil, for one), vegetables, fruit, and some nuts/seeds.

The idea with paleo is that we’re eating more in line with what our ancestors ate, not the processed stuff that’s available in mass quantity today. The grain-heavy processed food is relatively new on the scene — historically speaking — and our bodies haven’t adapted to be able to process it. Obesity and all the bad stuff that accompany it is the unhappy result of this kind of consumption. Paleo gets back to basics — back to eating what our bodies have been consuming for many thousands of years.

Grains = Bad. Make sense?

If you spend any time at all reading about this topic, you’ll notice that there are an infinite number of ways to “skin” (pun intended) the paleo deal. Everyone and their mother has their own particular brand of primal/paleo: there’s the super-strict, dogmatic version that eschews all lentils and dairy on one end of the spectrum…and then there are the folks that take a more pragmatic and lenient  stance. Mark’s Daily Apple trends toward the latter…as do I, and many others that I follow.

However, all primal/paleo advocates agree on one thing: grains and cereals are a giant no-no. And this is the reason — the secret, I guess — to the bulk of my weight loss over the past three months. I cut down my grain consumption by 90 percent and the pounds just…fell…off.

I won’t get into the mechanics of why grains are so rough and tumble on the body (others can do the topic far more justice) but if you eliminate the bulk (90 plus percent) of the grains/sugars/cereals from your diet…you will be floored how easily the weight comes off.

I’m not a doctor, of course, so I’m sure there are genetic (freak?) exceptions to this rule out there — but it works for me, and I’ve seen it work for others, too.

I used to eat oatmeal for breakfast. No more. I’ve been eating organic eggs and bacon — and usually some boiled broccoli, peas or spinach to satisfy the vegetable angle. Lots of meat, lots of veggies, and some fruit.

Do I cheat? Hell yes…but only on weekends, and only a bit here and there. Come Monday I’m back on the paleo wagon.

Dust off the pots and pans…because paleo doesn’t come in a can.

If you decide to give the paleo deal a shot, you’ll find that you’ll need to do some more cooking. Tough to find paleo boxed up nice and neat in the local supermarket, after all.

I’m not a real picky eater, so throwing some ground beef, yams, peppers and onions in a pot…adding some curry…then boiling for half an hour, is a great way to have some meals handy for a few days. (Let me know if you want the exact ingredient proportions I use.)

Having the right food ready to go is important. Without it, temptation may set in and you’ll be face deep in a bag of Doritos in no time. I know I’m definitely guilty of this. As above, the solution is cooking a bunch of food ahead of time and freezing or refrigerating. Bacon and eggs is a quick solution, as is a handful of almonds. Frozen vegetables are great to have around as well.

OK…this is starting to get wordy, and I think you get the idea. Let me know if you have comments/questions.

Next up….we’ll dive head first into the arena of “percentage of max” training. And boosting your strength will be the result.

-Mike

Photo: michael.cortina

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Technorati Tags: , , , ,


2
Jun 10

Life Wellness Nutrition…And Dodging Sweet Tooth Temptation

Without fail it happens to me every day around 3PM…the craving for something sweet…and usually hangs around until about 7PM.  If you’ve spent any time trying to stick to eating along the lines I mentioned in a previous post, or any other diet for that matter, then no doubt you’ve experienced the same “phenomenon.”

Here’s the thing: you can’t dodge the temptation altogether.  For me it’s gotten easier to deal with the past few months as my sweets intake has gotten less and less.  When the feeling comes on I’ll usually eat a pear, or sometimes a Lara Bar to squash the urge to inhale a box of Munchkins.  Keeping plenty of water on hand usually helps as well, and eating enough “real” food during the day helps curb the cravings.

I usually keep stash of Lara’s with me at all times.  They’re not the perfect snack solution (wish they packed more protein) but they’re relatively inexpensive by bar standards, wheat free, have no preservatives, and travel well.  I’m on the road a lot and they come in handy in a pinch.  And eating one or two is usually enough to keep me from hard-charging the Taco Bell drive through.

Here’s another tip for putting the kibosh on the sweet tooth:

Try cooking at least one meal a day at home, rather than opting for the fast food option.  Among the many benefits of cooking your own food, you can put into it what you want.  The fast food option, while convenient, is usually laden with all the nutritional no-no’s.  But that’s no secret.

By the way, I’ll happily eat a donut or cupcake from time to time.  As long as I’m sticking within the confines of an 80/20 nutrition regimen (meaning 80% of the time I’m eating what I should,) and getting my workouts in, then I’m OK.  Truthfully, I don’t ever see a time when I’ll go completely doughnut-free.  Might work for some people, but I’m not a monk.  It’s about a balance of practical life wellness.

So…80/20 on the food, workout like you should, add in some willpower, and you’re on your way to weight loss and optimum health!  (Easier said than done, I know.)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Technorati Tags: , , , ,